Renaming std.conv

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> Rory McGuire Wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:36:15 +0200, Sean Kelly <sean at invisibleduck.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
>>>> We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any
>>>> other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.
>>>>
>>>> Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
>>>> exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain
>>>> file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?
>>> The trace functionality already exists in druntime.  As for exceptions,  
>>> they may belong there as well if they're ones the runtime should be  
>>> aware of.
>> How does one get a print out of the stack trace then? Is it a setting or  
>> something?
> 
> I should qualify my original statement by saying that it's only implemented for Linux and OSX so far.  I have some of the declarations in for the Windows implementation but haven't gotten to it yet.

My stack traces look indecipherable on Ubuntu. They only contain module 
name and memory address.

Andrei