Container hierarchy vs. container types
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Thu Mar 4 22:53:32 PST 2010
Robert Jacques wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:22:55 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I like this idea. I've gotten used to using template constraints and
> ranges when coding which matches this strategy naturally. A lot of the
> capabilities seem to match ranges, but why did you use different names
> for some of them?
> removeBack : popBack
> removeFront: popFront
> pushBack : put
> pushFront : putFront?
>
It's intentional. You don't want to use a container as a range by mistake.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list