[OT] Thunderbird 3 vs. 2
Nick Sabalausky
a at a.a
Wed Mar 10 22:04:10 PST 2010
"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote in message
news:hn9e8o$4ls$2 at digitalmars.com...
> On 03/10/2010 06:13 PM, grauzone wrote:
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> The kick-off meeting for Thunderbird 3:
>>>
>>> "Thunderbird 2 is quite sluggish, has poor asynchronous execution of
>>> tasks, poor focus control, and annoying modal dialogs on error. What
>>> do we do for version 3?"
>>>
>>> ...
>>
>> The main reason why I went back to Thunderbird 2 is that version 3 eats
>> too much of my precious screen space, displaying useless information
>> such as the group a post was posted to. I couldn't find out how to get
>> the brief subject-poster one line display for post headers...
>
> I forgot to post that one! Incredibly annoying. I'm looking at all that
> crap and all that comes to mind is: "What were they _thinking_?" I mean
> it's so obviously a step back!
>
Standard Mozilla practice is to change shit in questionable ways and give
the finger to anyone who liked the old way. That's one of the main reasons I
can't stand Mozilla. </rant that's been a looong time coming and that I'm
glad to finally get out>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list