[OT] Thunderbird 3 vs. 2

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Andrei Alexandrescu" <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> wrote in message 
news:hne38s$a8f$1 at digitalmars.com...
> On 03/12/2010 12:48 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Andrei Alexandrescu"<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>  wrote in message
>> news:hne1t0$72k$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> On 03/12/2010 12:27 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>>> Wow. You know, a lot of people consider Outlook Express the red-headed
>>>> stepchild of email/ng clients (largely because of the security problems
>>>> that
>>>> were fixed ages ago). But I use it every day and it doesn't have
>>>> *anything*
>>>> like that.
>>>
>>> OE (at least as of the last time I used it) is much worse than TB, no
>>> question about that. One simple matter - you can't archive messages
>>> without using the mouse. As bad as Thunderbird is, it is way more
>>> productive than OE.
>>>
>>> Andrei
>>
>> Current folder: Alt-F, F, C
>> All folders: Alt-F, F, F
>
> ?
>
> I have one folder called "Archive" in my IMAP account. I have read a 
> message and I want that message moved to "Archive". What steps do I need 
> to take?
>

I never really use IMAP, so I'm not sure if this will apply (though I assume 
it will), but this works for me:

Move message (email-only): Ctrl-Shift-V, then type (or use arrow keys) to 
navigate to the desired target folder, then Enter to move it, or Esc to 
cancel.

Copy message (both email and newsgroup): Just like "move", but use "Alt-E, 
P" instead of "Ctrl-Shift-V".

Not sure if that's good enough?

Of course, this is all on XP, Outlook Express v6.00.x. For all I know they 
may have changed things for Vista or 7 (although, after having actually 
tried both Vista and 7, they'd have to drag XP from my cold dead hands).