Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PITA

[yigal chripun]

bearophile Wrote:

> yigal chripun:
> > This was brought up many many times in the NG before and based on past occurences will most likely never change.
> 
> If I see some semantic holes I'd like to see them filled/fixed, when possible. Keeping the muzzle doesn't improve the situation :-)
> 
> Bye,
> bearophile

I agree with you about the gaping semantic hole. All I'm saying is that after bringing this so many times to discussion before I lost hope that this design choice will ever be re-considered.