Ranges and/versus iterators
Fawzi Mohamed
fawzi at gmx.ch
Wed Mar 24 15:05:57 PDT 2010
On 24-mar-10, at 15:11, Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
>
> On 24-mar-10, at 15:00, Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> give a try to
>> bool popFront(ref T) ( or next, or another name, or even just a
>> delegate with that signature)
>> I was surprised how well it works, not perfect but better than the
>> other alternatives I had tried.
>
> I forgot to say, that one of the main pita with that approach is
> having to declare the arguments before using them, but should you
> decide that it is indeed a good alternative I have no doubt that you
> could find a good syntactic sugar that Walter could implement... :)
if one would have methods
bool f(ref T)
as valid iterators
then syntactic sugar replacing
expr(f(auto a));
with
static if(is(f S==function)){
S args;
expr(f(args));
} else {static assert(0);}
would be nice.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list