Can D be cute? (Qt)

[Lutger]

Michel Fortin wrote:

> On 2010-05-08 09:24:55 -0400, Lutger <lutger.blijdestijn at gmail.com> said:
> 
>> 2: It's attractive not only because it is so huge, well designed and
>> supported, but also because it performs, is cross-platform and looks good
>> everywhere (as opposed to Java and gtk)
> 
> Everywhere? Saying Qt apps looks good and behave well on a Mac is kind
> of a stretch. I have yet to see one that is not sub-par compared from
> what I would expect from an equivalent Cocoa implementation.
> 
> It's the same for all cross-platform toolkits really: they were first
> meant to work on Windows or Linux, so they're designed as such and it
> shows. Here's a nice comment to read:
> http://illogic-al.org/blog/look-before-you-leap#comment-74
> 
> 

Ah sorry I didn't know it was so crappy. Qt used to look different on windows 
too, not crap but just not native. In this area Qt is rapidly improving, the 
comment you cited is posted a while ago. Qt 4.6 can use Cocao now, I found 
this link in the docs:

http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.6/qtmac-as-native.html