Alternative typeof syntax

[Clemens]

Nick Sabalausky Wrote:

> Besides, I love member access syntax in general. In addition to (safely) 
> reducing parenthesis, it also sidesteps the oddity that nested function 
> calls are written/read *backwards* from the order of execution (ie, 
> "A(B(C()))" means "call C, then B, then A"). I've even been toying with the 
> idea of a language design that places primary emphasis on member-call syntax 
> and consistent left-to-right ordering.

You mean like Smalltalk?