Misc questions:- licensing, VC++ IDE compatible, GPGPU, LTCG, QT, SDL
Walter Bright
newshound1 at digitalmars.com
Thu May 20 10:06:17 PDT 2010
- Previous message: Misc questions:- licensing, VC++ IDE compatible, GPGPU, LTCG, QT, SDL
- Next message: Misc questions:- licensing, VC++ IDE compatible, GPGPU, LTCG, QT, SDL
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
retard wrote:
> It's a rookie mistake to believe that languages have some kind of
> differences performance wise.
Well, they do. It's also true that these performance differences can be swamped
by the quality of the implementation, and the ability of the programmer. But
that doesn't mean there are not inherent performance differences due to the
semantics the language requires.
It's like car racing. The performance is a combination of 3 factors:
1. the 'formula' for the particular class you're racing in
2. the quality of the construction of the car to that formula
3. the ability of the driver
It's simply wrong to measure the performance and then naively attribute it to
one of those three, pretending the other two are constant.
- Previous message: Misc questions:- licensing, VC++ IDE compatible, GPGPU, LTCG, QT, SDL
- Next message: Misc questions:- licensing, VC++ IDE compatible, GPGPU, LTCG, QT, SDL
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list