Nick Sabalausky <a at a.a> wrote:
> - if ( m > 12 ) {
> + if ( p && m > 12 ) {
>
> And you can toss in an "if(m>12) assert(p);" if you're worried about
> that.
Of course. But the point is, this is unnecessary. We know p !is null
when m > 4.
--
Simen