null [re: spec#]

[Jussi Jumppanen]

so Wrote:

> At initialization rvalue should not contain anything about 
> lvalue, this is absurd.

That may well be the case. 

I was only pointing out that as far as the Microsoft 
compiler is concerned, saying the code:
 
    'compiles with no warning, no error, nothing...'
    
is incorrect. It will issue a warning even if the default 
warning level of 1 is used.

Now as to question whether or not this is a smart way 
to handle the situation, that is a totally different 
discussion all together;)