datetime review part 2 [Update 4]

[Yao G.]

On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:11:59 -0600, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>  
wrote:

> I think that the real question here is how good the API is.

I think that the sheer size of the library, specially with a datetime.d  
file with almost 31,600 lines of code (granted, most of them are unit test  
and documentation), makes a little difficult to analyze or give a proper  
review of the code. It will takes a fair share time to do it. Maybe that's  
why very few people has given criticism or suggestions. I only gave a  
cursory view (you need to scroll a lot just to find the implementation  
code), but I'll give it a more throughly review tonight.

-- 
Yao G.