Call to immutable method during immutable construction

[Jens Mueller]

Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 November 2010 13:01:55 Jens Mueller wrote:
> > > So, while I don't necessarily see anything wrong with calling fun() in
> > > this situation being legal, I don't see the point.
> > 
> > My main point is that I'd like to know what is implemented as in
> > mentioned TDPL and what isn't.
> 
> I suspect that someone like Don or Walter would have to answer in this case. 
> They're the most likely to know what the compiler is actually doing vs what they 
> intend it to do. A bug report on it should likely be opened though, since it 
> doesn't match TDPL. Either it needs to be fixed to match TDPL (which is likely in 
> this case), or it needs to be made clear what behavior it's supposed to have, at 
> which point the TDPL errata should be updated.

I added a report.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5200
Thanks for your help.

Jens