One year of Go

[dennis luehring]

Am 13.11.2010 08:53, schrieb Russel Winder:
> On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 15:07 -0500, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>>  The lack of generics and dangerous concurrency are much bigger issues.
>>  If D can actually be shown to be a useful concurrent language, instead
>>  of the buggy and incomplete mess it is now, then it might have something
>>  to crow about.
>
> What do you see as wrong with the Go model for concurrency?
>
> I find the process/message-passing approach infinitely easier than
> shared-memory multithreading with all its needs for locks, monitors,
> semaphores or lock-free programming.  True operating systems will need
> these latter techniques, but surely they are operating system level ones
> and should never have to appear in application code?
>

...True operating systems will need these latter techniques...

gain speed and very granular control by introducing more risky technics: 
that not only a need for True operating systems, Ds approach is to allow 
(i hope better/less risky) both