The D Scripting Language

[gooba]

spir Wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:44:06 +0100
> Per Ångström <d-news at autark.se> wrote:
> 
> > On 2010-11-16 01:10, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> > > I think allowing the second expression in the ternary operator to be omitted
> > > would be a better fit for D, and provide the same function.
> > >
> > > ie.
> > > auto x = a ? a : b;
> > > auto x = a ? : b;
> > 
> > Personally I had '|||' in mind, but I'm OK with '?:'. I think it should 
> > be one single token and not an extension of the tertiary operator, though:
> > 
> > auto x = condition ? a : b; // tertiary operator
> > auto x = condition ? : b; // error, did you forget the middle operand?
> > auto x = a ?: b; // OK
>  
> Yes, then it becomes a binary operator :-) Read "a if defined, else b".
> 
> 
> Denis
> -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> vit esse estrany ☣
> 
> spir.wikidot.com
> 

They now added Scala to scriptometer http://rigaux.org/language-study/scripting-language/ it sees abomination i/o classes don't stop it being better script language then d. What can do? Scala bad competition and straight better. Next release has std.script?