Logical const

Simen kjaeraas simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 03:24:27 PST 2010


Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> It still is not verifiable. That's why logical constness is not a  
> language issue, it is a convention.

And finally I understood what you meant. Sorry about this taking a while.

-- 
Simen


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list