We need to kill C syntax for declaring function types

[Don]

Jesse Phillips wrote:
> bearophile Wrote:
> 
>> Jesse Phillips:
>>
>>> Is any tested done against deprecated features?
>> Keep in mind that so far the main purpose of the -d in DMD2 was (I think) to enable Phobos code marked with "deprecated".
>>
>> Bye,
>> bearophile
> 
> Yes, and I think that if the code still exists and can be compiled then it should still be tested. I would agree that adding tests, or fixing bugs, isn't really a good idea, but it would be a good idea to keep existing tests and test with the -d option (that is new functionality isn't broken with -d enabled either).

Don't worry, that happens.