Tuple literal syntax

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:52:56 -0400, Walter Bright  
<newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Ellery Newcomer wrote:
>> I might be missing something, but how does this proposal get around the  
>> ambiguity in
>>  (a,b,c)[0]
>>  ?
>>  Currently, it's valid C syntax and valid D syntax. In your proposal it  
>> would be valid tuple syntax too.
>
> As has been proposed frequently, the , operator would have to be  
> dispensed with.

I think what Ellery is alluding to is it breaks the rule that things that  
are valid C syntax do the same thing that happens in C.  Of course we've  
broken this rule a few times.

-Steve