Tuple literal syntax

Jonathan M Davis jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Fri Oct 8 03:48:17 PDT 2010


On Friday 08 October 2010 03:30:35 bearophile wrote:
> Lars T. Kyllingstad:
> > Personally, I don't think we should start adding a dedicated tuple syntax
> > at this point.  There are so many things that are more important, and
> > besides, I think the library tuples are pretty cool.  We should instead
> > focus on making Tuple!(...) even better.
> 
> Tuples are a basic part of a language, they need to come before web tools,
> loggers, numeric libraries and so on. You build Phobos and all those
> things with a language. So if the language is better, you will work
> better.

Agreed. But that doesn't mean that library solution isn't the best solution.

- Jonathan M Davis


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list