"in" everywhere

[so]

> Reading these boards, both new and old posts, i hardly find any topic  
> that i disagree with you.
> This one is one of those rare cases.
>
> It is really hard for me to connect "operator usage" and "operation  
> complexity". To me, operators are just "cute", and mostly meaningful  
> (and not necessarily) shortcuts.
> You can overload any operator, doesn't matter what it says/feels, you  
> can do pretty much anything you like, on any complexity level.
>
> Either purge it (you get Java) or lift the restrictions and let coder  
> have it.
>
> Thanks.
>

Language libraries are special and naturally care needs to be taken, you  
would need strong guaranties for pretty much anything in Phobos.

You can just use some other function, as a reference library, by doing  
that you also discourage its usage on things that require strong  
guaranties.

Thanks.

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/