improving the join function

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 10/11/2010 08:57 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
> But right now the point is: join() does something completely different
> and should be renamed (or deprecated in std.string and replaced by
> union() - a real join isn't needed in std.string anyway, but when join()
> is deprecated in std.string you can implement a real join in
> std.algorithm without causing too much confusion).

I think union() is a worse name than join(). The discussion was to 
generalize within reason std.string.join, which is present under that 
name and with that functionality in many other languages and libraries.

Andrei