duck!

[Walter Bright]

Kagamin wrote:
> Walter Bright Wrote:
> 
>> Which blog article would you click on? "Interface Adapter for D" or "Duck
>> Typing for D"?
>> 
> You are somewhat right. The right place for marketing is an article, not the
> library source, right?

They're both important. Especially consider that Phobos is open source, is on 
the internet just a click away, and the words used in it are indexed by Google.


> What would you click on? "Duck typing for D" or
> dsource.org/phobos/src/trunk?

If I'm looking at a list of modules for Phobos, and I see "std.duck" as a 
clickable link, I'll click on it.

If I google for "adapt for D" I'll get a hopeless mess of irrelevant links. 
"duck typing for D" should be much better. Remember that google ranks pages by 
relevance, and searching for "duck" will give higher ranking for pages with 
"duck" in the url, title, headings, etc. That's just what we want.