duck!

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 10/16/2010 04:52 PM, Michael Chen wrote:
> totally agreeed. let advertisability to influence a function name is
> ridiculous to me. you gotta have some princeple for names, but
> advertisability? i dont think so.

It is a function, but it implements an entire feature - like e.g. 
"cast". What if D has casting but called it e.g. "force"?

I'm looking for a name that is descriptive and evocative.


Andrei