A quotation from Reddit

so so at so.do
Thu Oct 21 02:24:25 PDT 2010


These features are must have for a modern language, falling back to a  
dynamic language for scripting is understandable but reflection?
One another thing is the environment you like to work with and this is his  
real point IMHO. He likes to work in a dynamic typed environment like  
Python, and when it is not enough he switches to another language. Those  
who like to work in a static language had/have no choice, but D.

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:32:06 +0300, bearophile <bearophileHUGS at lycos.com>  
wrote:

> A quotation from a little comment I've found on Reddit:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/dtnwe/how_often_is_the_speed_of_python_considered_when/c12uk3g
>
>> Finally, by the time you have implemented reflection, introspection, a  
>> decent plugin system and meta objects in your C++ application you've  
>> inevitably Greenspunned yourself a dynamic language anyway. Why bother,  
>> when you can take Python off the shelf?<
>
> I presume in large C++ programs those features are useful. A way to  
> solve this problem is to give those features to D. An alternative  
> solution is to make D very easy to interoperate with a dynamic language  
> as Python/Lua/Ruby. A third way is intermediate, this means adding more  
> static introspection to D, and allowing for an easy interfacing between  
> D and a dynamic language. This third way may be the best.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile


-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list