Marketing D [ was Re: GCC 4.6 ]

[dsimcha]

== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a at a.a)'s article
> I'm starting to
> think the problem D faces with adoption is that it *doesn't* suck. If it
> did, people would probably be all over it.

I know you're kidding, but ironically you may be right in a way.  Sometimes D
needs to realize that worse is better.  For example:  The discussion on arbitrary
cost copy construction.  It's silly to contort half of Phobos to efficiently
support a paradigm that is only used in a few niche areas and is widely regarded
as a questionable practice, especially outside of the C++ community.