On 4/3/2011 1:23 PM, Dan Olson wrote: > Thought I'd test drive octal!. I'm still on v2.051 though. > > writefln("%o", octal!777); -> 777 > writefln("%o", octal!0777); -> 511 (0ops) > > Maybe in a new version the second line will generate a error for the > leading zero on the second line? > Yes, it will.