On 4/3/2011 1:23 PM, Dan Olson wrote:
> Thought I'd test drive octal!. I'm still on v2.051 though.
>
> writefln("%o", octal!777); -> 777
> writefln("%o", octal!0777); -> 511 (0ops)
>
> Maybe in a new version the second line will generate a error for the
> leading zero on the second line?
>
Yes, it will.