User-Defined Literals in the D Programming Language
Trass3r
un at known.com
Wed Apr 6 13:58:30 PDT 2011
> http://drdobbs.com/blogs/tools/229401068
Nice article, but after reading the title I was actually expecting an
article more about real user-defined literals (and its quirks as we
recently discussed in
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/user_defined_literals_132779.html)
There even is a proposal to remove it from C++0x:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2011/n3250.html
Maybe some more reasons for not having real user-defined literals could be
given before explaining how to implement something like it in user code.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list