[OT] open-source license issues

[Kagamin]

spir Wrote:

> There is a point I don't understand: if I'm right, LGPL as well as all other 
> "open source", not strictly free-software, licenses allow using licensed 
> software even for "privative" (proprietary) work. But they wouldn't allow using 
> software for work licensed under other open-source licenses like the Boost license?
> Where's the bug?

They can be used, but they can't become proprietary or Boost licensed.