GC for pure functions -- implementation ideas
Walter Bright
newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Fri Apr 15 13:53:59 PDT 2011
On 4/15/2011 1:12 PM, Don wrote:
> In reality, things are going to be a bit more complicated than this. But
> it seems to me that conceptually, something like this could still stay fairly
> simple and be very, very fast. With no changes required to the language, and not
> even any changes required to existing code.
I think it's a good idea.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list