too early for D2 and too late for D1

[jasonw]

Walter Bright Wrote:

> On 4/17/2011 1:46 PM, jasonw wrote:
> > I'd like to hear your comments about the 32-bit D2 and minimal executables
> > issue. If I use dietlibc and gcc, the minimal (static) binary is about 0.2
> > kilobytes. DMD should have some switch (-embedded) which leaves out all the
> > cruft I don't need. I'd like to use the cool new features and start with this
> > kind of minimal executables. 0.5 - 50 kilobyte range is optimal.
> 
> Are you talking about static linking, or using shared libraries?

I mentioned static binaries, but I meant statically linked binaries. So yes, a situation where everything, including the standard library, is statically linked.