deprecated delete and manual memory management

[Daniel Gibson]

Am 27.04.2011 22:37, schrieb so:
>> It'd create template bloat and uglier syntax (expecially confusing for
>> people coming from about any other popular OO language) for a really
>> common, standard feature.
>> These drawbacks are acceptable for custom allocation and other stuff the
>> average user shouldn't care about, but not for an elemental feature like
>> "new".
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Daniel
> 
> For the template bloat, yes that would be a problem.
> But it is not ugly! Take it back! :)
> 
> auto a = new A;
> auto a = new!A();
> 
> auto b = new B(5);
> auto b = new!B(5);
> 
> For the confusion part, the real confusion (rather shock) awaits when
> they get to the part where they see "new" but no "delete".
> We could argue against this all the way, but to every single of us "new"
> and "delete" are a pair.

No, in Java and C# there's no delete.