deprecated delete and manual memory management

[KennyTM~]

On Apr 28, 11 04:28, Daniel Gibson wrote:
> It'd create template bloat and uglier syntax (expecially confusing for
> people coming from about any other popular OO language) for a really
> common, standard feature.
> These drawbacks are acceptable for custom allocation and other stuff the
> average user shouldn't care about, but not for an elemental feature like
> "new".
>
> Cheers,
> - Daniel

Er elemental? If 'new' is deprecated then a 'class' and 'array' will be 
constructed with

     class K { ... }
     auto k = K(...);           // no new
     auto a = int[] (k.length); // no new

same as how a 'struct' is constructed now. The only situation left where 
'new!T()' is really necessary is when you need to create a T* on heap 
(GC.malloc) e.g.

     int* ps = new!int(4);

I fail to see this is elemental in D.