Fixing enum names in Phobos
Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisProg at gmx.com
Thu Aug 4 09:00:29 PDT 2011
On Thursday 04 August 2011 08:59:11 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Thursday 04 August 2011 07:33:55 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > On 8/4/11 12:16 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > > So, does anyone actually have an opinion on this? Should we fix the
> > > names or not?
> >
> > We should probably fix the names. A migration path is to simply keep
> > both names for a year or so and remove documentation for old names. For
> > example:
> >
> > enum Variadic {
> >
> > no, /// doc
> > NO = no,
> > c, /// doc
> > C = c,
> > d, /// doc
> > D = d,
> > typesafe, /// doc
> > TYPESAFE = typesafe
> >
> > }
> Not to mention, I don't think that we can actually deprecate enums anyway,
I meant that I don't think that we actually actually deprecate individual enum
_values_.
- Jonathan M Davis
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list