std.concurrency wrapper over MPI?

[Sean Kelly]

Nope. It would represent an external destination and defines the protocol. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 6, 2011, at 6:57 PM, dsimcha <dsimcha at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 8/6/2011 8:26 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> I'm hoping to simply extend the existing API. The crucial portion will be the addition of a Node (base) type.
> 
> So Node would be the equivalent of Tid in the current API?