The current status of D?

[Don]

On 06.12.2011 09:37, bearophile wrote:
> Don:
>
>> Right. But it's hard to come up with high-priority language issues these days. The old ones have been fixed.<g>.<
>
> There are several things that I'd like to see fixed/improved in D still.

Yes, of course. But most of the showstoppers are done.
Not so long ago there were major features in the spec or in TDPL that 
weren't implemented at all - contracts, @safe, pure, inout, TDPL 
operator overloading, almost nothing worked in CTFE, Phobos didn't 
compile on 64 bits, ...