Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd

[dolive]

Daniel Murphy Wrote:

> "Nick Sabalausky" <a at a.a> wrote in message 
> news:j4gflo$1c59$1 at digitalmars.com...
> > I'm wondering if maybe the problem is that it needs a different approach. 
> > I suspect a big part of the reason it's stagnated is because it's 
> > difficult to update to new versions of DMD.
> >
> > I think what's needed is an approach where changes from DMD to DDMD are 
> > minimal. Plus a "staged" approach to maximize DDMD's usefulness while it's 
> > under development. This is what I have in mind:
> 
> I actually had some success with a similar approach in the past, converting 
> parts of the lexer to D (before I got sidetracked fixing dmd bugs).  For 
> this to be viable, D needs to be able to call normal C++ functions, C++ 
> non-virtual member functions (including constructors), and access data 
> members of C++ classes. 
> 
> 

How about Progress at ? Look forward to ddmd early resurrection !
thanks all !

dolive