Suggestion for std.process upgrade
Trass3r
un at known.com
Mon Dec 12 15:04:47 PST 2011
> There is a completely revamped version of std.process. It is being held
> up right now because DMD on windows depends on DMC for it's C runtime,
> and DMC has issues supporting pipes.
Walter should just release the few parts of the source code that according
to Mehrdad are needed to get rid of it:
> Right, but my point is, I could work around (I've gotten within inches
> of it!)
> it if simply Walter released a TINY part of snn.lib -- just a handful of
> tiny source
> files regarding the TLS-related stuff, EXE segment markers, and whatnot.
> (I've already raised this issue before, and precisely what we would
> need, but it seemed to go completely ignored.)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list