SDC & ddmd

[dolive]

Bernard Helyer Wrote:

> We intend to be compatible with DMD to a point. Where we are not, 
> will be through omission. Off the top of my head:
> 
> *delete will not be implemented.
> *scope classes will not be implemented.
> *complex numbers will not be implemented.
> *version/debug levels will not be implemented, as their semantics 
> are poorly documented, and I've never seen them used in any code 
> anywhere.
> *C style function pointers will not be supported.
> *The D calling convention will not be matched, at least not in 1.0
> (extern (D) is currently fastcall)
> *D's forward reference and module order bugs will not be 
> supported.
> 
> And others I've probably forgotten. In terms of release date, I 
> can't really say, sorry. Currently working on the D interpreter 
> for CTFE and constant expressions, if you're interested. :D
> 
> 
> -Bernard.
> 

So many features are not implemented can be
compatible with dmd2 ? In addition , the current sdc in what state?
 Feature list is up to date?  what time  is expected time to be completed for 0.1?

Good luck!


dolive