d future or plans for d3

[bearophile]

Vladimir Panteleev:

> Sacrificing something (performance, executable size) for 
> something else is not an unilateral improvement.

I presume they will add a very easy way (like a compilation switch? No need to modify druntime, or to recompile DMD, or to write your own GC) to switch back to less precise regime, or generally to avoid paying for things you don't want to pay. LDC compiler has pragmas to avoid specific typeinfos and moduleinfos, but it is a non portable thing and it's kind of low level.

Bye,
bearophile