Could we use something better than zip for the dmd package?
Nick Sabalausky
a at a.a
Thu Dec 22 08:45:15 PST 2011
"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.1834.1324571496.24802.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
> On Thursday, December 22, 2011 06:25:42 a wrote:
>> Why are you ignoring the statement about 7z having the same
>> accessibility
>> level as rar? Rar files are not rare and users who can open rar files (on
>> Windows usually with WinRAR or 7zip) can also open 7z files.
>
> But not without installing 3rd party software. Windows can handle zip
> files out
> of the box. It can't handle the others. rar would have exactly the same
> problem as 7z files (though from what I've see rar files are much more
> commonly
> used). We _could_ use a file format other than zip, but then we'd be
> requiring
> that the user download a 3rd party app just to be able to open the file,
> which
> is _not_ the case with zip.
>
Once again:
1. "If you're a programmer, or even just a power user, you have absolutely
no
excuse not to *already* have a 7z-capable program [EDIT: such as WinRAR, for
instance] installed."
2. "What the hell programmer is limited to whatever archive support just
happens to be
built into Windows?"
Even *in addition* to all of that, the built-in windows support for zip is
*extremely* dummy^H^H^H^H^Haverage-Joe -oriented. Page after page of
hand-holding "wizard" *just* to "extract here"? I can't imagine any
programmer or power user even being capable of putting up with that for more
than a few days before finally just grabbing WinRAR, etc. And I'm not just
speculating: Honestly, I've never even known *one* programmer or power user
who actually used Windows's built-in zip support.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list