On 12/22/11 4:20 AM, Stewart Gordon wrote:
> Looks complicated compared to mine at first sight.
++
I strongly prefer the look of Stewart's formatting strings; at a glance
it is much easier for me to understand "yyyymmdd`THHiisszzz" than
"%4yplus%04+Y%02M%02D{T}%02H%02m%02s%f%tz".