System programming in D (Was: The God Language)

[so]

On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:11:54 +0200, Vladimir Panteleev  
<vladimir at thecybershadow.net> wrote:

> On Friday, 30 December 2011 at 12:05:27 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 12/30/2011 06:58 AM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 23:47:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>>>> ** The X template
>>>
>>> Good work, but I'm not sure if inventing a DSL to make up for the
>>> problems in D string mixins that C macros don't have qualifies as  
>>> "doing
>>> it right".
>>
>> It certainly does. That is how all my code generation looks like. The  
>> fact that I am using string mixins to solve some problems shows that  
>> those are not 'problems in D string mixins'.
>
> Never mind. You're right. I hadn't thought of this before (using DSL  
> nesting to avoid breaking token nesting); it's a nice idea. I think I'll  
> steal this for my code :)

For me, mixin sounds much more intuitive than inline for what we are  
trying to achieve with force-inline.
If it was user friendly now that would be awesome.