buffered input

[spir]

On 02/05/2011 08:45 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> One thing I'm wondering is whether it'd be more efficient if we could provide
> our own buffer to be filled. In cases where you want to preserve the data, this
> could let you avoid double-copying: first copy in the temporary buffer and then
> at the permanent storage location. If you need the data only temporarily
> however providing your buffer to be filled might be less efficient for a range
> that can't avoid copying to the temporary buffer for some reason..

Does this also makes sense when one needs to iterate over a whole set of source 
data via buferred input rangeS? I mean the same buffer can be reused, avoiding 
repeted allocation (or is this wrong or irrelevant?).

Deins
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com