std.unittests/exception Update and Vote

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.1276.1296831944.4748.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
>
> So, please make any last comments or suggestions on this proposal, and 
> vote on
> whether you think that assertPred should be in Phobos (assuming that 
> assert
> isn't going to be improved such that assertPred isn't necessary) and 
> whether you
> think that assertThrown, assertNotThrown, and collectExceptionMsg should 
> get in
> regardless of whether assertPred does.
>

I'm in favor of all of them.

Sure, maybe we could do better than assertPred, but when's that actually 
going to happen? In the meantime, assertPred is a hell of an improvement 
over the current state and it exists *now*. I don't want to needlessly 
hijack the present just for the sake of some still-hypothetical future.