How will we fix opEquals?
Don
nospam at nospam.com
Thu Feb 10 00:19:38 PST 2011
Andrei once stated a worthy goal: as far as possible, const should be
opt-in: it should be possible to code without requiring const on everything.
opEquals() is in conflict with this, since it is a member function of
Object.
(1) If it is a const member function, then it will have a viral effect
on all objects -- any function called by opEquals will have to be marked
const.
(2) If it is not const, then const objects cannot be compared!
Currently, it's not const, but the problem isn't visible because of
compiler bug 5080. (Same problem applies to opCmp).
How will we break this dilemma?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list