Stupid little iota of an idea

[Christopher Nicholson-Sauls]

On 02/11/11 18:46, so wrote:
>> atob(1, 6) // easy to mix things like atoi
>> ptoq(1, 6) // rocks imo!
> 
> walk(1, 6) // now you have admit this is the best.

I dunno.  When I see 'walk' I think of collections, not ranges.  But...
I don't think it'd be terribly ambiguous, at least.

For the record... I "get" the iota name... and I don't buy the
eye-ambiguity with itoa.  We should be using to!string, yes?  But I'd be
happy to see a more descriptive name, so keep at it.

-- Chris N-S