Unilink - alternative linker for win32/64, DMD OMF extensions?
Akakima
akakima33 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 12 15:58:14 PST 2011
> Making optlink open source won't make any difference. Few are skilled at
> asm anymore, and likely none of them would want to work on optlink for
> free.
That's true. But the real problem is not optlink. Optlink is a very good
linker.
The problem is OMF. 11 years ago OMF was a good choice. But not anymore.
I know you are a competent (probably very competent) compiler writer. You
modified D on linux, so it produce ELF. How much time would that take to
modify DMD so it produce COFF ? Given all the bad publicity OMF gives to D,
it should be viewed as a good choice.
There are many (not much), but there are open source linkers. Of course ld
is not as fast as optlink, but it's good. And there is a faster version made
by the project Ultimate++ IDE.
Going to COFF would have a lot of advantages for everybody and for D.
Do you agree ?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list