'live' testing style

[spir]

On 02/15/2011 10:00 AM, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:03:06 +0100, spir wrote:
>
>> 1. Named unittests allowing test suites in the form of (just an
>> example):
>>
>> unittest test1 {
>>       ...
>> }
>> unittest test2 {
>>       ...
>> }
>> unittest test3 {
>>       ...
>> }
>> unittest {
>>       test1;
>>       test2;
>>       test3;
>> }
>>
>> /Unnamed/ unittests are run with --unittest. Named ones are intended to
>> be called from unnamed ones. Backward compatible change.
>
> Works now:
>
>    version(unittest) void test1() { ... }
>    version(unittest) void test2() { ... }
>    version(unittest) void test3() { ... }
>
>    unittest
>    {
>       test1();
>       test2();
>       test3();
>    }

Agreed, that's about what I do. The whole point is to have it as a standard 
feature of the language. You don't need the current 'unittest' feature to write 
unittests, do you? I doesn't even solve typing (or so few?). But as stated by 
Walter, having it as a builtin feature makes the difference in D code beeing 
commonly unit-tested.

denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com