Uh... destructors?

[Michel Fortin]

On 2011-02-22 13:15:03 -0500, %u <wfunction at hotmail.com> said:

> So okay, fine... 2 out of about 8. That still doesn't mean the rest
> of them should be allowed, though... think about how confusing code
> with a "pure" destructor would be.

What's the problem with a pure destructor? It only means you can't 
access global variables. If the object holds a pointer to somewhere, 
you can still affect that somewhere.

In fact, if your struct's destructor isn't pure, how can you use it as 
a local variable inside of a pure function?

-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.com
http://michelf.com/