Shouldn't hasSwappableElements work on char arrays?

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 2/24/11, Steven Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> A string literal is immutable, dchar[] is mutable.  These should work:
>
> immutable(dchar)[] test = "test";
> dstring test = "test";
> auto test = "test"d;

Ah right, the postfix form. That's what i was looking for. I know a
literal is immutable, I've tried
"test".dup, but it still complained that it's not of type dchar. Anywho..

> wait, you thought char[] was an array?  You poor poor soul ;)

Yes. And you know what's going to happen next, right? Everyone is
going to create their own implementation of a string type because of
these non-issues. Happens in C/C++ all the time, I see it in almost
every mid-large codebase out there.

But w/e, strings are perfect in D etc etc..